1 + 2 + 3 + … = – 1/12 and Related Results

The seemingly bizarre result in the title of this article has surprisingly found its way into some branches of advanced physics including string theory.  Its ‘proof ‘ is demonstrated in one of the Numberphile videos on YouTube where divergent series are manipulated in an easy-going manner, along the following lines:

  T = 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + … 

  T = 0 + 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + 1 − …

2T = 1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 +  … = 1,   ⇒  T = ½

  U = 1 − 2 + 3 − 4 + 5 − 6 + 7 − 8 + …

  U = 0 + 1 − 2 + 3 − 4 + 5 − 6 + 7 − …

2U = 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + … = T = ½,   U = ¼

S = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + …

U = 1 − 2 + 3 − 4 + 5 − 6 + 7 − 8 + …

S − U = 2(2 + 4 + 6 + 8 + … ) = 4(1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + … ) = 4S,  ⇒  3S = − U = − ¼

whence S = − 1/12.  Mathematically this result can be recognised as an expression of the Riemann zeta function ζ(z) evaluated at z = − 1.

It occurred to me that it should also be possible to sum powers of the natural numbers using the same carefree operations on divergent series as in the Numberphile video.  In the linked discussion Some Fun with Divergent Series, I first evaluate the sum of the squares of the natural numbers S2 and then, after a digression on Abel summation and the Riemann zeta function, I generalise the method to find the sum Sn of the series of natural numbers raised to the nth power.  Initially a recursion relation is found for a related quantity Tn  , the sum of powers of the natural numbers with alternating signs.  This leads directly to the formula for Sn and its connection with the well-known Bernoulli numbers.

After completing this article I discovered a WordPress blog by the eminent Australian/American mathematician Terry Tao. In one of his published articles there, entitled The Euler-Maclaurin formula, Bernoulli numbers, the zeta function, and real-variable analytic continuation, he explores the summation of powers of the natural numbers in much greater detail and, of course, with considerably more insight than anything I could offer.  Nevertheless I have kept my approach posted here as it is a natural generalisation of the informal method shown in the Numberfile video referred to above.



Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s